| Characteristic | Inbox placement rate | Spam rate | Missing rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
The chart is not accessible to screen readers. Please switch to the table view to access the data.
Download
Source
Source
Release date
August 2018
More information
Region
Worldwide
Survey time period
Q2 2015 to Q2 2018
Special properties
based on 2 billion promotional email messages sent to consumers around the world between April 2015 and June 2016
Supplementary notes
The source provides the following information: "Information captured from high volumes of monitored email accounts (seeds) controlled by senders to sample mailbox providers’ placement decisions irrespective of user-initiated or engagement-based filtering. For new programs with little or no history of subscriber interaction, seeds can provide an accurate assessment of inbox placement."
Figures for periods prior to Q3 2017 come from previous reporting.
Citation formats
