
| Characteristic | GCI Score | Legal | Technical | Organizational | Capacity Building | Cooperation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 100 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| United Kingdom | 99.54 | 20 | 19.54 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Saudi Arabia | 99.54 | 20 | 19.54 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Estonia | 99.48 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19.48 | 20 |
| Korea (Rep. of) | 98.52 | 20 | 19.54 | 18.98 | 20 | 20 |
| Singapore | 98.52 | 20 | 19.54 | 18.98 | 20 | 20 |
| Spain | 98.52 | 20 | 19.54 | 18.98 | 20 | 20 |
| Russian Federation | 98.06 | 20 | 19.08 | 18.98 | 20 | 20 |
| United Arab Emirates | 98.06 | 20 | 19.08 | 18.98 | 20 | 20 |
| Malaysia | 98.06 | 20 | 19.08 | 18.98 | 20 | 20 |
Download
Source
Release date
June 2021
Region
Worldwide
Survey time period
2020
Number of respondents
141 respondents
Special properties
ITU member states
Method of interview
Online survey
Supplementary notes
The five pillars of the GCI:
1. Legal: Measured based on the existence of legal institutions and frameworks dealing with cybersecurity and cybercrime.
2. Technical: Measured based on the existence of technical institutions and frameworks dealing with cybersecurity.
3. Organizational: Measured based on the existence of policy coordination institutions and strategies for cybersecurity development at the national level.
4. Capacity Building: Measured based on the existence of research and development, education and training programmes; certified professionals and public sector agencies fostering capacity building.
5. Cooperation: Measured based on the existence of partnerships, cooperative frameworks and information sharing networks.
Citation formats









