| Characteristic | A bit much/too much | Just right | Too little/little tourism |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
The chart is not accessible to screen readers. Please switch to the table view to access the data.
July 2023
New Zealand
April 28, 2023 to May 18, 2023
1,431 respondents
18-74 years
weighted by gender, age, and region to be representative of the New Zealand population based on 2018 population estimates
Online survey
Minimum quotas were set to ensure sufficient representation from traditional tourism hotspots.
Participants were asked about their perception of the level of tourism in their community using a five point scale where 1 = too little and 5 = too much.
May not total to exactly 100% for all communities due to rounding.
Sample size by community/region:
- Queenstown: 150
- Rest of Bay of Plenty: 50
- Rotorua: 100
- West Coast: 100
- Gisbourne/Hawkes Bay: 100
- Wellington: 130
- Rest of Otago: 100
- Northland: 100
- Auckland: 150
- Taranaki: 100
- Canterbury: 150
- Manawatu-Whanganui: 81









