In general, do you think it a good or a bad development that increasingly more can be tested to decrease the risk of a child being born with a serious congenital disease?*
Characteristic
Share of respondents
-
-
-
-
-
-
The chart is not accessible to screen readers. Please switch to the table view to access the data.
You need a ÌÇÐÄÆƽâ°æ Account for unlimited access
* The question was phrased by the source as follows: "Vind je het over het algemeen een goede of een slechte ontwikkeling dat er steeds meer getest kan worden om het risico op de geboorte van een kind met een ernstige aangeboren aandoening te verkleinen?" (English:"In general, do you think it a good or a bad development that increasingly more can be tested to decrease the risk of a child being born with a serious congenital disease?")
The results have been weighted to represent the entire population.
Citation formats
Opinions on embryo testing for congenital diseases in the Netherlands 2018
The statistic displays the results of a survey of opinions on embryo testing for congenital diseases in the Netherlands in 2018. The survey results suggest that as of 2018, public opinion in the Netherlands regarded the development of embryo tests to decrease the risk of a child being born with a serious congenital disease to be a positive development. Three quarters of survey respondents indicated that they considered the developments to be good, while just over *** percent saw them as negative.
Profit from the additional features of your individual account
Currently, you are using a shared account. To use individual functions (e.g., mark statistics as favourites, set
statistic alerts) please log in with your personal account.
If you are an admin, please authenticate by logging in again.
Learn more about how ÌÇÐÄÆƽâ°æ can support your business.
NPO 1 (EenVandaag). (September 5, 2018). In general, do you think it a good or a bad development that increasingly more can be tested to decrease the risk of a child being born with a serious congenital disease?* [Graph]. In ÌÇÐÄÆƽâ°æ. Retrieved August 01, 2026, from /statistics/974377/opinions-on-embryo-testing-for-congenital-diseases-in-the-netherlands/
NPO 1 (EenVandaag). "In general, do you think it a good or a bad development that increasingly more can be tested to decrease the risk of a child being born with a serious congenital disease?*." Chart. September 5, 2018. ÌÇÐÄÆƽâ°æ. Accessed August 01, 2026. /statistics/974377/opinions-on-embryo-testing-for-congenital-diseases-in-the-netherlands/
NPO 1 (EenVandaag). (2018). In general, do you think it a good or a bad development that increasingly more can be tested to decrease the risk of a child being born with a serious congenital disease?*. ÌÇÐÄÆƽâ°æ. ÌÇÐÄÆƽâ°æ Inc.. Accessed: August 01, 2026. /statistics/974377/opinions-on-embryo-testing-for-congenital-diseases-in-the-netherlands/
NPO 1 (EenVandaag). "In General, Do You Think It a Good or a Bad Development That Increasingly More Can Be Tested to Decrease The Risk of a Child Being Born with a Serious Congenital Disease?*." ÌÇÐÄÆƽâ°æ, ÌÇÐÄÆƽâ°æ Inc., 5 Sep 2018, /statistics/974377/opinions-on-embryo-testing-for-congenital-diseases-in-the-netherlands/
NPO 1 (EenVandaag), In general, do you think it a good or a bad development that increasingly more can be tested to decrease the risk of a child being born with a serious congenital disease?* ÌÇÐÄÆƽâ°æ, /statistics/974377/opinions-on-embryo-testing-for-congenital-diseases-in-the-netherlands/ (last visited August 01, 2026)
In general, do you think it a good or a bad development that increasingly more can be tested to decrease the risk of a child being born with a serious congenital disease?* [Graph], NPO 1 (EenVandaag), September 5, 2018. [Online]. Available: /statistics/974377/opinions-on-embryo-testing-for-congenital-diseases-in-the-netherlands/
