| Characteristic | Totally agrees | Agrees | Neutral | Disagrees | Totally disagrees |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - |
The chart is not accessible to screen readers. Please switch to the table view to access the data.
Download
Sources
Release date
February 2018
Region
Chile
Survey time period
2017
Number of respondents
*
Method of interview
Face-to-face interview
Supplementary notes
*Respondents were 36 experts in agronomy, plant genetics, plant physiology, food technology and human nutrition from 24 countries.
The source does not provide the exact date of the survey.
The source does not provide any information regarding percentage points exceeding 100 percent.
Citation formats









