| Characteristic | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
The chart is not accessible to screen readers. Please switch to the table view to access the data.
Download
Source
Sources
Release date
May 2022
More information
Region
Worldwide
Survey time period
2016 to 2021
Number of respondents
6,264 respondents
Special properties
Individuals who have bona fide credentials in IT or security fields
Supplementary notes
* Percentage defines the share of respondents who indicated that the particular encryption technology feature was 'very important' to their organization's security posture, on a four point scale.
Citation formats
