Cross-border payments value, by country 2022| ��ƽ��

Leading countries in the world with the highest transaction value on processed international money transfers and remittances as of 2022, either incoming or outgoing (in billion U.S. dollars)

Characteristic	Transaction value in billion U.S. dollars
-	-
-	-
-	-
-	-
-	-
-	-
-	-
-	-
-	-
-	-

Download

Source

Show detailed source information?

Already a member?

Source

In cooperation with

Release date

May 2023

More information

Region

Worldwide

Survey time period

March 2023

Special properties

transaction value; The source does not clarify whether this includes all transfers. such as B2B and/or B2C, or whether this included cash and/or digital remittances; The source also does not clarify whether these are outgoing and/or incoming payments, and/or a combination of the two

Supplementary notes

All figures provided are estimates.

The source did not provide data on other countries and/or other years, and did not clarify the year for the data provided. It is assumed that it refers to 2022 - as the source usually reports either 2022 or 2027 in its studies as of May 2023.

Citation formats

Estimates are that the value of international money transfers in the United States in 2022 was nearly ** times higher than in the United Kingdom. This is according to a model that tried to estimate the market size of international payments, such as remittances, across various countries worldwide. The source does not add much information. For instance, it does not clarify whether this includes all cross-border payments or whether it focuses on specific aspects of this industry - such as remittances by itself, or either the B2B or B2C segments. When compared to the 2021 KNOMAD figures - the "official" figures on remittances - regarding remittance outflow for the United States, the difference with the transaction value reported here was roughly ** billion U.S. dollars. The difference for outgoing remittances from the United Kingdom as reported by KNOMAD was also sizable. Both differences may be due to different market models and methodologies, although neither source goes into detail about this.